Sunday, March 24, 2013

Well, the world didn't end...

Every year around Oscar time, I become reflective of the films I’ve seen from the previous year and start finalizing my top ten favorite movies within that timeframe. I don’t know if it’s my exponentially waning interest in the Oscars with every passing year that makes the task more and more difficult, or if the quality of films is gradually declining in general. Probably a little of both. That’s why it’s taken me a month to finally sit down and write this and, even now, it feels like a chore.

Not that this year was devoid of good movies. There were plenty. However, it did seem harder to prioritize them in order of how much I enjoyed them. It seemed like every time I sat down to weigh my opinion of each film, I was forced to rearrange the list almost entirely. It got to the point where I thought I might do this year’s list alphabetically. That seemed like too much of a cop-out, though. So, in being aware that this is not the ten commandments being carved into stone tablets and that I’m merely one out of a million online jackasses spouting off about which movies I liked better than all the others, I said “screw it” and finally settled on an order that I’m happy with. For the moment, anyway. By this time next week, I could have the list completely redone again. It’s certainly true that my previous lists are all in a constant state of flux and often changed significantly after catching up with movies I missed the first time around. So, with that in mind, here are my top ten favorite films from 2012 in the order that makes the most sense to me right now at this very second:

#10: Moonrise Kingdom – Here’s a perfect example of why compiling this year’s top ten list was like pulling teeth. Of the ten listed, I probably saw this one first (earliest in the year, I mean) and, consequently, I remember very little about it except that I really liked it a lot. Seeing it again and reacquainting myself with its magic would probably bump it up further, but given the fact I don’t recall many specifics indicates it didn’t leave that much of a lasting impression. So, my conscience dictates it be relegated to the number ten slot. It just barely edged out Argo, which I had seen more recently, do remember, and did really like, so that should give some perspective on how good Moonrise Kingdom was given that Argo won the Best Picture Oscar. What I remember most about Moonrise Kingdom was its overall impression. It felt like a live-action “Peanuts” comic strip. Very charming and sweet but also rambunctious and kinda dark. I’ve always appreciated Wes Anderson’s work, but, with the possible exception of The Royal Tenenbaums, I think this could be his best film. I’ll hafta see it again, though, to make sure.

#9: Silver Linings Playbook – Romantic comedies are tricky. They have an automatic tendency towards schmaltzy sentiment. In fact, they almost can’t exist without it. Silver Linings Playbook has it in bits and pieces, even ending with the male lead literally running after the female lead once she’s walked out and he realizes he loves her (if you think that’s a spoiler then I’m afraid I’ve spoiled the ending of pretty much every romantic comedy ever made), but the ways it differs from garden-variety romantic comedies outweigh the similarities and thus justifies itself. The lovers in question are flawed to the point of literally being mentally ill which makes their romance more powerful and volatile. It’s brilliant, really, because their instability makes for a suspenseful relationship while at the same time making you root for them more than you would a well-adjusted couple. That’s about as good a complication as any romantic comedy has to offer.

#8: Kon-Tiki – I read this book back when I was in sixth grade and remember very little about it except that it had a lot of sharks. Naturally, that memory was enough for me to want to see the movie many years later. I had also read “Life of Pi” many years ago (not as early as sixth grade, obviously, but probably about a decade ago) and saw that movie as well. While I enjoyed the book for “Life of Pi” more than the book of “Kon-Tiki”, I definitely liked the film version of Kon-Tiki more than the film version of Life of Pi.  Not only did it strike me as a more authentic portrayal of being adrift at sea (due in no small part to being a true story, I’m sure), but I found Kon-Tiki to be much more visually breath-taking. This is largely because the special effects seemed so much more realistic. Watching Life of Pi, I was thinking, “Wow, the CGI for that (insert name of any of the many animals that appear in the film here) looks pretty real.” Watching Kon-Tiki (which, although no tiger, had just about as many sea creatures in it as Life of Pi did), it didn’t even occur to me that they were using CGI, although they must have, right? Even the scene where they pull a great white shark onto the deck must have been a model of some kind, but I’ll be damned if I could tell the difference. That kind of authenticity makes all the difference. Plus, it’s just a great movie.

#7: Brave – I usually try to see PIXAR movies in the theater because they’re always such a feast for the eyes. This one somehow got by me, though, and I saw it on DVD a couple months ago. Maybe I didn’t make it a priority because a lot of critics seemed to say it was a fairly pedestrian and unspectacular PIXAR flick, inferring that they’d reached some kind of plateau and were just kinda going through the motions at this point. At least that was the impression I was getting from the press. I don’t know what they were talking about, though. This film is fantastic and meets all the requirements of the high bar that PIXAR has set for itself: A great story, vivid characters, beautiful imagery, exciting action sequences, intelligent humor, truly touch moments and, most importantly, an uplifting and valuable message. It even had the heroic female lead that audiences specifically asked for. I loved it and was mad at myself for not going out of my way to see it in the theater. I don’t know where the disappointment other movie-goers experienced came from. Maybe I’m just easier to please than most other PIXAR fans, but, if that’s the case, I’m totally okay with it.

#6: Flight – I often roll my eyes whenever somebody (usually Spike Lee) accuses Hollywood of overlooking exceptional work of black people in filmmaking. But, given the track record of Denzel Washington, sometimes I wonder. It’s not that he’s gone unappreciated, but let’s review: Mr. Washington has been nominated for six Academy Awards throughout his acting career and, of those six, he’s won two. Not too shabby, right? However, the roles he won for were Glory, where he played a Civil War slave, and Training Day where he played a corrupt ghetto cop. Those were both great roles that he was amazing in, but I’m reminded of a speech Eddie Murphy’s character gave in Bowfinger: “White boys get all the Oscars. It’s a fact! Did I get a nomination? No, and you know why? ‘Cuz I ain’t played none of them slave roles and get my ass whipped. That’s when you get the nomination. Black dude play a slave role, get his ass whipped, he get a nomination. White boy play an idiot, they get the Oscar. Find me a script as a retarded slave, then I’ll get the Oscar.” That’s all for laughs, of course, but when you look at the roles Denzel Washington has been nominated for and didn’t win, it’s a bit odd. There’s no doubt that Daniel Day-Lewis is a fine actor, clearly one of the best actors alive today, but let’s face it; for the role of Abraham Lincoln, 50% of that performance is putting on the hat and the beard. Watch Denzel Washington as a hopelessly addicted yet somehow functional chronic alcoholic dealing with conflicting emotions of being both a hero and a culprit in the midst of a highly-publicized tragedy and tell me that his wasn’t the best performance of the year.

#5: Django Unchained – This film probably bounced up and down the list more than any other, so I finally settled on putting it right at the halfway point. At times, it feels like the best movie of the year and, in other places, it feels incomplete and slightly awkward. Ultimately, I think the film is either too long or too short. Some characters and scenes seem undeveloped to the point where I think they should have been cut out altogether. But, at the same time, I feel like there’s more there we’re not seeing and the movie would greatly benefit from it. Could this be because it’s Tarantino’s first film made without his usual editor, the late Sally Menke? Tarantino has said that there’s an “Extended Cut” that he may or may not release after the film has completed its international screenings. That’s what I wanna see. After that, I’ll feel better about my final verdict. Either way, though, this is an incredible and impressive flick that further illustrates Quentin Tarantino’s ever-growing talent and even maturity as a writer/director. He just may be too big for the movies and better suited for mini-series. I, for one, am sick of filmmakers being forced to snip their films in order to fit some pre-determined cookie-cutter timeframe. Anybody who’s seen the extended director’s cuts of The Wild Bunch or Das Boot would have to agree with me. The theatrical cuts of both those films are tragically inferior, as is Django Unchained, I suspect. As Roger Ebert says, “No good film is too long and no bad film is short enough.”

#4: Sleepwalk with Me – I’m not sure what to say about this film, honestly. It came to me through word of mouth and I knew very little about it when I finally sat down to watch it. I’m reluctant to say much about it and deprive anyone who hasn’t seen it of the same experience. It has all the traits and ingredients of a semi-autobiographical independent film. You can take that as either a plus or minus. It’s very quirky (some friends of mine thought it was too self-indulgent and, while I can’t argue with them, I don’t think that’s necessarily a bad thing in this case) with lots of dry humor and amusing, albeit highly clichéd, characters. Overall, it’s an interesting look at one man’s search for himself and his passion – which, throughout most of the movie, he’s not even sure exists. That’s a pretty good way too sum it up without revealing too many details. I also thought it was modestly profound (even accidentally, perhaps) and could be very inspiring to the right person. What kind of person I couldn’t say any more than I could effectively describe this movie without telling you the entire story. It’s a “ya had to be there” kinda thing.

#3: Celeste and Jesse Forever – I’ve been waiting for years to see a romantic comedy where the leading characters are broken up and don’t get back together. They came close with (500) Days of Summer, but that film had too many flashbacks of when they were together and in love. This film only glazes over the real relationship via photos shown during the opening credits. When the movie begins, Celeste and Jesse are broken up and the rest of the movie explores what a couple does when they seem to everyone (including each other) to be a perfect match yet still cannot be together. It begins modestly by going for easy laughs and light conflict, but it sneaks up on you with matters that are simmering below the surface of its gregarious façade culminating into a pretty deep and insightful dramedy about the complexity of relationships, whether they be romantic or platonic. There are times where we, the audience, want Celeste and Jesse to get back together and other times when we feel they shouldn’t. Best of all, at the end, when the past has been set and the lessons have been learned, we’re left with a sense of hope rather than happiness. Isn’t that the best life has to offer us most of the time? When romantic comedies (even ones as good as Silver Linings Playbook) tend to finish with either living happily ever after or tragically broken-hearted split-ups, it’s refreshing to see one that’s realistic enough to acknowledge that, in many cases, people usually end up somewhere in between.

#2: Chronicle – Movies wherein people possess superpowers are appealing to us for a variety of reasons, first and foremost because of escapism. We all want to be powerful and we all like to fantasize about what we’d do if we were. Most times these scenarios are manifested in such ways as the wizards of “Harry Potter” or the Jedi of “Star Wars” or the mutants of “X-Men”, but occasionally, somebody’s ambitious enough to take a step back and look at the more human elements of superpowers. This was done with great hypothetical insight in such films as Unbreakable and Hancock, but Chronicle is much more thoughtful and surprisingly haunting than any other rendition I’ve seen. The stroke of brilliance is making the lead characters teenagers. Already brimming with their own social angst and changing bodies, when they stumble upon powers that they learn can be harnessed in a variety of ways, they’re faced with the conundrum of realizing that what they want doesn’t often line up with what is right. With the first-person “found footage” technique employed here, we see the once powerless teenagers using their abilities to go from amusing themselves to playing pranks to self-serving indulgences that escalate into mass destruction. Another significant aspect of using teenagers is that, in that period of experimentation that all adolescents go through, we see first hand how some kids, with even the most seemingly inconsequential behavior, will evolve into conscientious adults while others will inevitably destroy themselves, whether it be through drugs or sex or telekinesis.

#1: The Avengers – As good as Chronicle was, you just can’t beat The Avengers. This was a throwback for me, not just because it contained superheroes I grew up admiring, but because it reminded me of those kinds of movies (prolific in the 80’s) when action/adventure flims were fun and light-hearted and more akin to rollercoaster rides than merely stories. Superhero movies like this are hard to pull off, too. Not only are they as naturally inclined to be campy every bit as much as romantic comedies are inclined to be sappy, ensemble casts like this are often spread too thin and not given enough to do. That’s what killed the X-men series, in my opinion. In The Avengers, everybody’s given their moment to shine. Ask anyone what their favorite part of The Avengers was and you’ll probably get a different answer every time because there’s so much good stuff. If movies are meant to entertain, this has to be the most economical movie in years because there truly is never a dull moment. I enjoyed this movie so much that I didn’t particularly care for The Dark Knight Rises when it came out a month later. “Lighten up, Batman. Otherwise that Justice League movie's gonna be a real downer.”

2013 ought to be an interesting year for me personally. I won a year’s worth of free movies at any Cinetopia location, so I’ll probably see every movie that comes out this year (that I can stand to sit through, that is). So, next year’s list will be nothing if not thorough. Until then: So long, 2012. And thanks for the movies.

Monday, March 26, 2012

The Oscars have their list, I have mine.

According to my calculations, I saw 52 films from the year 2011. That averages out to one movie a week. I don’t know what my usual haul is, but that seems like a lot. Unlike most years, this past one didn’t contain any flicks I was really anticipating impatiently. Even Captain America (whose comics I have been reading since before I even knew how to read) didn’t really incite that “hurry-up-and-be-released” feeling I usually get. My general dissatisfaction with the films of 2011 (the mainstream ones, anyway) was perfectly summed up by my overwhelming ambivalence of the Academy Awards. I didn’t even watch the show this year. Not even the multitude of Oscar parties I was invited to could make me care. As I compiled my top ten list throughout the passing year, I wasn’t very impressed with it. They were decent movies, sure, but nothing I was particularly excited about. I knew I was gonna have a hard time writing about how much I liked these movies when my longstanding number one film was Cowboys & Aliens.

Thankfully, I spent the early part of this year tracking down those more obscure films from last year that had caught my attention, but eluded me when (or even if) they played in the theaters. I think that’s probably why my view count was so high this year: I kept watching ’til I found something good. In previous years, when I thought That’ll do it, this year, I thought C’mon, you can do better’n that. And I’m glad I did because amidst 2011’s sea of mediocrity, I found some real treasures. It always makes me feel good when my top ten list contains great stuff my readers have probably never seen, but should.

#10: Martha Marcy May Marlene – The Academy’s complete shut out of this film in the Oscar nominees is a big part of why I didn’t really care what actually was nominated this year. This is such a brave and powerful film, how could it be totally ignored? My guess is because the writing, acting, directing, and editing (all of which it should be highly praised for) are so subtle, that they’re virtually unnoticeable. One watches this film and feels almost as though it’s a documentary. Plus, the ending is so disturbingly vague that, while most conventional movie-goers who insist on being spoon-fed their stories probably hate it, it really is a brilliant “conclusion” that drives home the intensity of the film’s message. And what a spectacular debut from Elizabeth Olsen. Let’s hope that despite the public’s lukewarm reception of this film, she still manages to land roles as bold as this one and move out from under her sisters’ shadow into the spotlight.

#9: BridesmaidsKristen Wiig finally lands a starring role and proves she has the chops to be a star - not only as a comedienne, but possibly a serious actress as well. While this film could have settled for being a showcase of dirty jokes and absurd situations going from bad to worse, Wiig (who also wrote the script) fits in a good amount of authentic sentimentality and melancholy without feeling forced. I was actually taken aback by how much I not only sympathized with her character, but identified with her as well. I wasn’t expecting that and, as funny as the movie was, I found those sweet scenes to be the best of the film. Another refreshing change was how the comedic situations were allowed to develop and unfold at their own pace. A frivolous movie like this tends to cram in one joke right after another with very little cohesion, but Bridesmaids was willing to indulge the possibilities of consequences and aftermath even when it wasn’t particularly necessary. Most female alumni from “Saturday Night Live” end up settling for sitcoms, but let’s hope Kristen Wiig sticks to movies and raises the bar accordingly.

#8: Green Lantern – I suspect most people would think my inclusion of this film would render this top ten list null and void, but Green Lantern did not deserve to be as thoroughly crucified as it was. It deserves defending and I’m happy to do it. First of all, superhero movies are a huge gamble to begin with. It’s really hard to translate something that’s awesome in the comics into something that’s awesome onscreen and, trust me, this film could’ve been much, much worse. I, for one, thought it was an exemplary summer popcorn flick. The action scenes were exciting. The special effects didn’t feel cartoony. The dialogue wasn’t insulting. The characters were likeable (even the bad guys). The romantic subplot didn’t feel forced or pointless. Okay, so it didn’t measure up to the caliber of The Dark Knight or even the original Iron Man, but it didn’t have to, either. A movie should be judged on how well it attains the goals it sets for itself and Green Lantern delivered exactly what I wanted from it: I found it entertaining and exciting, which is more than I can say for Thor (which, for some bizarre Twilight Zone reason, most people seemed to like more than Green Lantern).

#7: The Artist – As dissatisfied as I was with the line up of Oscar nominees, I’m glad that this film took the grand prize. Rewarding such a lovely film is a step towards renewing my faith in the politically-sapped, self-congratulatory Academy Awards (but that’s still a long road, I’m afraid). I was a big fan of the director’s previous work with Jean Dujardin in the two OSS 117 spoofs and I hope their respective Oscar wins don’t keep them from making more additions to that hilarious series. Although, if they continue making more films like The Artist, I guess I can’t really complain. Anyway, while it seems like such a corny cliché to compliment a movie by calling it “magical”, that really is the best word to describe The Artist. A lot of critics have been comparing it to Singin’ in the Rain, and Sunset Boulevard and rightfully so. Offhand, I can’t think of a recent film that so lovingly pays tribute to the origins of filmmaking than this one. Hollywood needs to be reminded of its roots once in a while.

#6: My Week with Marilyn – I’ll admit it: There’s a good possibility that the reason this movie rated so high on my list is because I’m a heterosexual man. I was pretty mesmerized whenever she was onscreen and never got tired of it. In fact, I think I felt just about every emotion the lead character felt about Marilyn Monroe as he was feeling it: awe, respect, sympathy, affection, frustration, concern, pity and, not love, but possibly the potential to love her if she let me. Marilyn Monroe is not an easy role to play (particularly because she had something that no woman before or since has ever had), but Michelle Williams really rocked it – particularly in her ability to devour a man with her eyes. This movie also made the right move by doing a biopic on a specific part of a person’s life rather than trying to cover the whole gamut. I think that’s why J. Edgar and The Iron Lady weren’t as good (that, and because they weren’t about Marilyn freakin’ Monroe).

#5: Win Win – With every movie he makes (Win Win being his third), Thomas McCarthy gets closer and closer to joining my (short) list of directors whose work I will check out without even bothering to learn what the film’s about. This is largely due his writing more than his directing, but since he’s written everything he’s directed, I’m hoping this will be an ongoing package deal. He has an uncanny knack for making his characters remarkably human to the point where after seeing them onscreen for merely 30 seconds, you feel like you know them. Consequently, most of the humor and tragedy in his films comes across as accidental. Case in point, every film he’s made so far (including Up, actually, which he co-wrote) is about characters circumstantially finding surrogate families with people who start out as total strangers with whom they have almost nothing in common. You’d think that scenario would become tiresome, but McCarthy’s films are as uniquely individual as the eclectic characters that inhabit them. I realize I’ve said nothing about Win Win specifically, but I’ve done you a favor. The less exposition you know going into it, the better.

#4: Our Idiot Brother – Like Win Win, the strength of this movie comes from the realism of the characters and the players in Our Idiot Brother are so wonderfully authentic that I’m wondering how much of the film was inspired by real life. It was, after all, co-written by a guy, his sister and her husband. This film is consistently funny and, after a certain point that I’d be hard pressed to identify, becomes even funnier from just being familiar with the relationships of the characters. I’m not sure it was meant to be a “feel-good” movie (another term, along with “magical”, I am loathe to use), but it’s certainly one that makes you feel like life will be okay no matter what. It’ll also probably make you appreciate your family more. There’ve been a number of movies that I’ve enjoyed so much I wish they were longer, but I actually wish Our Idiot Brother was a television series so it could go on indefinitely.

#3: Red State – When Kevin Smith first departed from what’s been called the “View Askewniverse”, he made Jersey Girl, a romantic comedy that failed miserably (although, I personally didn’t think it was all that bad). His penultimate film was the aptly-named Cop Out, which also flopped but, in Smith’s defense, he didn’t write that one. Red State didn’t do much better than either of those films, but that’s a damn shame because it is one hell of a movie. The only acceptable reason I can think of as to why audiences didn’t identify with this film is because it was way out of their comfort zone. Although, on that level, it measures up to the intensity of “theoretically this could actually happen” horror flicks like Deliverance and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre and it’s just as gut-wrenching. Doing a horror movie (especially an action horror film) is as big a departure as Smith has ever done, but now I wish he’d tried one sooner. His writing and directing on Red State are so effective that I think that Smith should not only make another horror film, but maybe try his hand at a war movie as well.

#2: Tales of the Night – Just like My Week with Marilyn ranked high with me ‘cuz I’m a dude, Tales of the Night scores big probably because I’m a graphic designer. That’s not to say it isn’t a superb film with a great story, but in this age of highly-detailed, meticulous 3-D computer animation, it’s nice to see an equally gorgeous animated film that could’ve been inspired by flannel board story-telling. The film is nothing more than a series of fables and folk tales being performed by stark silhouettes in front of colorful backgrounds, but it’s an absolute feast for the eyes. And the stories themselves are quite poignant and engaging for as short as they are. I have no idea if they’re based on actual fairy tales, but the film’s credits indicate it’s an original screenplay, which is all the more impressive. This is a French film scheduled for a wider release in America later this year. I can’t believe I’m saying this, but hopefully when it comes out, it will be dubbed rather than subtitled. I say that because, first of all, given the character design, it’s pretty insignificant if their lips don’t match the words (indeed, I doubt the viewer would be able to notice) and, secondly, if the viewer isn’t dependent on the subtitles, they’ll be able to take in all the visual wonders of this film even more effectively.

#1: The Lie – One of my favorite comedy routines is the schtick of the person who tells a horrible lie and tries to stick to it no matter how out of control it becomes, even if only as an attempt to save face. Chevy Chase had this down pat in the 80’s and Steve Carrell perfected this during his stint on “The Office”. I had heard of this modest film (a film seemingly dedicated to that scenario) and was interested in checking it out for some time before I actually found it on DVD. It was not what I expected, but I’ve never been so pleasantly disappointed with a film in my whole life. Yes, this movie’s about a guy who tells a bad lie that gets worse and, yes, it’s funny, but that’s only about maybe 10% of the movie. The heart of it is a beautifully reflective film exploring what one has and what one wants and what one does about it. I’m deliberately being vague here as I was with Win Win for essentially the same reasons. You could probably find out what the titular lie is by reading a synopsis of the film (in fact, I think they reveal it in the trailer), but you’d be better off not knowing and just let it present itself in the context of the film. Don’t be dissuaded by the fact that the poster makes it look like a garden-variety chick flick. This is a delightful movie and a fairly unconventional one at that.

So, I guess the key to a good year of movie watching is to ignore the masses and seek out what interests you personally. While I intend to do that again for 2012, let me just say thank god Christopher Nolan has another Batman movie coming out.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

The Sundance Kid Returns

The Oscar nominees were announced today. Regular readers will know that my interest in the Academy Awards has waned considerably with each passing year and this one is no exception. It's gotten to the point now where, this time of year, I'm thinking more about the Sundance Film Festival than I am about the Academy Awards. Unfortunately, deficient funds have prevented me from going to Sundance the past few years, but it occurred to me that it's been exactly five years since my first trip to Park City. So, for fun, I thought I'd post my original blog about losing my Sundance virginity. It's interesting to look back on these movies that were so fresh and unfamiliar back in 2007. The vast majority of these films have kinda fallen off the radar, which is a shame because most of them are worth looking up. Stay tuned for my top ten favorite films of 2011, but in the meantime, enjoy this blast from the past:

The Academy Award nominations were announced earlier this week and, while I haven't really looked at them with any degree of scrutiny, my first impression was that they did a pretty good job of selecting nominations this year. However, when I think about it overall, 2006 wasn't all that great a year for movies, though. There were a few gems out there, but nothing that really quickened my pulse and made me think "Damn, this is a REALLY good movie" while I was watching it. For example, there was no Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, no American Splendor, no Amélie, no Memento. I haven't really catalogued my top ten list of favorite movies this past year (stay tuned for a future post on that), but if I were to guess, I'd say the majority of my top ten for 2006 probably played at the Sundance Film Festival last January.

My friend DJ goes to Sundance every year and I had hoped to go with him last time. For one reason or another, I didn't, and consquently missed out on an early peek at the best films of the year. This year, I had sense enough to go and, man oh man, am I ever glad I did. My only regrets are that I didn't go any of the other previous years and that we didn't stay longer this year. Without going into too much detail (if you want the juicy insights of my glorious movie-watching, celebrity-spotting, party-crashing extravaganza, you'll hafta ask me yourself - you know my stance on blogging), here's a breakdown on the movies we saw during our six days in Park City, Utah. The titles are arranged in the order of how much I liked them:

1. Son Of Rambow: Not only was this my favorite film at Sundance, I'm willing to bet my bottom dollar it will be my favorite film of the year. It was so good I was almost brought to tears when it was over. Literally. This is one of those movies where if you don't like it, you're basically the antichrist. I'm definitely buying it and then watching it over and over.


2. Rocket Science: This is the first movie we saw and conicidentally the first movie selected for Sundance. I don't know whether to say it's tragically funny or comedically sad, but I can probably best sum it up by saying it's as flawless a portrayal of the awkwardness of adolescence as I have ever seen. I'm almost sorry I saw it before any of my other friends because I want to discuss it with so many of them.

3. Dedication: Anybody who knows me well will know why I liked this movie so much. It's hard to say which of the movies we saw had the best dialogue, but this one's right up there. The characters were so vividly written, I found myself wondering how they were doing afterwards. Dan, one of the guys we were sharing our condo with, actually worked on this movie as a P.A. He tried to get DJ and I into the premiere party afterwards, but apparently didn't have enough clout to have an entourage. We went to the Dough Boys premiere party instead.

4. Finishing The Game: Required viewing for anyone who's a fan of mockumentaries or Bruce Lee. After seeing a string of films that were somber and thought-provoking, this silly masterpiece really hit the spot. Another funny thing about this movie was that DJ and I had to rush out when it was over because we had another movie to get to right after. On our way out of the theatre, the cast and crew were on their way single-file into the theatre for the Q & A so it was like we had a visual, live-action end credits.

5. Teeth: Sick humor at its sickest. And pretty frickin' funny, too. I think the audience was the best part of this movie, actually. They squirmed and howled and cheered and gagged. You get a lot of people at Sundance who consider themselves holier-than-thou movie snobs seeking out arthouse flicks so they can talk about how cultured they are having seen these poignant, evocative films. Sundance needs a film or two like this to keep them on their toes and show them movies can be silly fun with no message or redeeming qualities whatsoever. Hard to believe I could enjoy a movie this much that contained so many severed penises.

6. Joshua: I felt like I'd seen this movie before, but I didn't care. Creepy kids are nothing new, but it did pretty brilliant job of balancing humor and suspense. The director said afterwards he always was a fan of cutting tension with humor. That's hard to do effectively, but this movie pulled it off quite well. Mostly due to the performances, I think. For example, the line "You don't beat up your kid in public on the weekend" delivered with the utmost sincerity was pretty hilarious.

7. Weapons: The most disturbing portrait of inner-city youth since Larry Clark's Kids. It's been a while since we've seen a movie with the same story told from different points of view and out of sequence. Tarantino made this technique popular with Pulp Fiction wanna-bees and it often feels contrived, but I thought it lent more to the story here.


8. Waitress: To be sure, this is a chick flick to the utmost degree, but a cute one. I liked it, but had a few problems with it. First and foremost, it shoulda ended sooner. After a crucial and moving scene, the screen faded to black and a few audience members began to clap in anticipation of the end credits. Next thing you know, a new scene begins and takes us through this totally unnecessary montage assuring us that everything turned out alright and everybody lived happily ever after. I prefer when movies like this end with a feeling of hope (like Dedication did) for the audience to contemplate rather than force-feeding them a happy ending. It's patronizing. My advice: If you go see this movie, exit the theatre when you hear the line "We're gonna have so much fun." You'll appreciate it more.

9. Save Me: I was expecting a movie condemning fundamental Christianity and defending the gay community through sympathy, but what I got was the most fair and evenly-balanced portrayal of the conflict between the church and homosexuality I've ever seen. I think even the most liberal homosexual and the most conservative Christian could watch this movie and both walk away feeling represented respectfully. I was surprisingly impressed - I didn't think that was possible. And another surprise: the mom from "Who's The Boss" turns in one of the best performances of the festival.

10. Padre Nuestro: DJ and I remarked how much this one reminded us of Maria Full of Grace. They're both Spanish-speaking movies filmed in America and written and directed by white boys. Funny how authentic both movies felt. There were some Mexican people in the audience who made a big deal about what a realistic case study this was about the struggles immigrants have trying to assimilate to America. Given that this movie was made by a gringo, I guess it just goes to show how much credibility comes from talent.

11. Never Forever: This one took a while to get going, but it got under my skin. You know the characters are headed towards disaster despite their best intentions, but you see the end of the tracks getting closer and closer. I wonder what percentage of movies have plot complications that stem from sex. Probably a helluva lot of 'em. Actually, most of the movies on this list have to do with big trouble spawned from sex or the pursuit of it.

12. Starting Out In The Evening: This is the kinda movie that I woulda been bored enough to commit suicide over when I was a kid. The kinda movie my parents would rent and I'd say "Well, I guess I'll go do my homework then." I still consider myself pretty immature, but there's a grown-up in me somewhere because I found this movie quite interesting. Really nothing more than character studies within a slice-of-life plotline, the dialogue held my attention and I cared about what went on. It ran a little long, but I never did look at my watch so I hafta say I enjoyed it.

13. Away From Her: My main incentive to see this was to see Sarah Polley in attendance because I've had a small crush on her ever since Go. I wasn't sure how much I'd like the movie 'cuz it's certainly aimed more towards older audiences (by the way, if your grandparents ever complain that there's no movies out there for them to see, draw their attention to this one), but like Starting Out In The Evening, it held my attention. Something the director said in the Q & A that I particularly liked was that she wanted to do this movie because it was a love story about a couple who'd been together for over 40 years and she was sick of seeing romances always taking place at the beginning of relationships when people are young and reckless. She's right, it's nice to see this for a change.

14. The Nines: DJ's gonna kill me for having this so low on the list, but what can I say - it didn't wow me as much as I felt it was supposed to. That might be because it was the fourth film we saw that day and late at night to boot (and we got very little sleep all week). I kept up with the convoluted plotline pretty well, but I didn't find it as clever as others seemed to. Maybe it deserves another viewing, but I didn't think it was that great despite being original and well-made.

15. Fay Grim: I have finally come to terms that I am not a Hal Hartley fan. That's not to say I dislike his movies, but they don't really do it for me, either. Not much more to say about this one except I guess you're either a Hartley fan or you're not. It was a treat to see Parker Posey in person, though.



16. On The Road With Judas: This is the only movie I saw at Sundance that I can truly say I didn't like. From stories DJ's told me of previous Sundance experiences, I should count my lucky stars there was only one. I felt like the director was trying to impress us with an unconventional story-telling technique which really didn't work. It was like a pathetic attempt at trying to make his ordinary story (which wasn't altogether bad, just insufficient) more compelling by trying to mimic Charlie Kaufman or something. The director came across as a real idiot in the Q & A, so I wasn't real surprised.

And that was the movie part of Sundance. There's much more to tell, of course, but since I've already spent all this time playing Roger Ebert, I'm gonna hang it up for now. I'd be surprised if many of you read this far anyway. If you did, you must be a pretty big fan of movies yourself and should go with me to Sundance next year. Oh, yes. I'm going again.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Do You Hear What I Hear?

BubléMele Kalikimaka

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Why You Should Register as a Republican (Yes, YOU!)

The GOP is rallying hard to find a candidate that can take out Obama in the 2012 election, but despite their passion and dedication, they’re having a difficult time of it. Most of the Republican candidates that have been the front-runner haven’t been in that position for long because it’s only a matter of time before they say or do something that either alienates their constituents or embarrasses themselves. This is, of course, much to the delight of Democrats. One often hears liberals muttering, “I hope [so-and-so] gets the Republican nomination, ‘cuz then Obama will be a shoo-in for re-election.” In other words, their dream is that the Republicans will champion somebody so ignorant and incompetent, the American people’s choice will pretty much boil down to “status-quo” versus “making things even worse”. This attitude is absolutely deplorable and goes against the very idea of Democracy.

Obama is going to get the Democratic nomination. There are no two ways about it. So, there’s really no point in the Democrats having a primary election, is there? If Democrats (or anybody, really) are so dissatisfied with the Republican party and its candidates, they should re-register as Republicans and then vote in their primaries for a Republican candidate they think could actually do a decent job. It doesn’t really matter if they disagree with their policies or political standpoints. The important thing is to get a candidate in there who won’t destroy the country (or the world, for that matter) if they end up being elected. If voters really want to change the face of the Republican party, they need to do it from within - like an undercover cop working with drug-dealers. Most probably view this idea as some kind of personal betrayal, but it’s not like being a Republican is a lifetime membership or anything. They can always re-re-register as Democrats again. Besides, one doesn’t need to be a Democrat to vote for Obama in 2012 anyway.

Gun enthusiasts (conscientious ones, anyway) hold the philosophy that there’s no such thing as an unloaded gun. This mantra serves to ensure that people will be more careful handling their weapons and reduce the likelihood of accidental shootings. Likewise, graphic designers and art directors (conscientious ones, anyway) know that you should never show an idea to a client that you don’t want them to pick because, chances are, they’re going to pick the one stupid idea they’re shown. These are examples why Americans (ALL Americans) should be mortified at the notion of having anybody on the ballot for President of the United States who isn’t fit for the job. If more people had had this philosophy ten years ago, this country might not have had to sit through eight years of irreversible damage caused by Dubya.

The whole point of Democracy is to have a choice. If a hungry person goes into a restaurant, the menu doesn’t give them an ultimatum of either soup or cyanide. They may not like soup, but they’ll certainly eat it if the other choice is poison. It’s better to go into a restaurant and have a choice of soup or salad. Some people like one, some people like the other. Both are free to decide which they want and neither are wrong. That’s what Democracy is (or should be) and even if one doesn’t like the taste of a particular candidate, they should at least be able to appreciate that someone else does. Nobody wants to eat poison and nobody wants it to run the country, either. Unfortunately, in America, not enough people would recognize poison even if it was killing them. So, it’s up to the rest of us to make sure it stays off the menu.